Am 29.05.2014 15:21, schrieb Marcel Apfelbaum: > On Thu, 2014-05-29 at 15:08 +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote: >> On Thu, 29 May 2014 15:56:16 +0300 >> Marcel Apfelbaum <marce...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> On Thu, 2014-05-29 at 14:40 +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote: >>>> Maybe we can hack QemuOpts to do s/foo_moo/foo-moo/ ? >>>> Than there won't be need for an explicit conversion and it could be reused >>>> by others, >>>> including X86CPU. >>> I like this idea, but this can't be generic for all QemuOpts right? Do you >>> mean adding a flag specifying we want this conversion? >> Flag would be less risky than doing it for all QemuOpts unconditionally. >> It would open road for conversion per a QemuOpts which probably should be >> done eventually if options are translated into properties. > Sounds fine, I can go for it. > Andreas, do you agree?
Whatever works to get a sane QOM ABI without bad side-effects. Andreas -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
