On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 12:24:26AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> But can we drop the EMULATED name somehow? Can we rename [1] the ioctl
> to say GET_UNSUPPORTED_CPUID or something along those lines? The name
> is just a really really bad pick.
What do you mean, a "bad pick" :-P? I added extra care in naming that
functionality what it is - bitfield in CPUID format of *emulated*
features. Unsupported is wrong too - we do support them if we enable
them explicitly. :-)
How about GET_NOT_REALLY_FAST_BUT_STILL_NOT_FAST_ENOUGH_AS_IN_HW_FAST_CPUID?
:-P
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
