On 26.06.2014 23:46, Eric Blake wrote:
On 06/26/2014 03:17 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
On 25.06.2014 16:35, Kevin Wolf wrote:
This is the first part of an attempt for disentangling bdrv_open(). At
the end
of this series, bdrv_open() code is somewhat easier to read, but the real
changes (including some bug fixes and changes of behaviour) haven't
happened
yet.
With this series, iotests 040, 041 and 067 fail for me. I attached the
result.
Actually, it wasn't this series, but the qapi-as-event series. See here
for more diagnosis and potential fixes:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-06/msg06554.html
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-06/msg06499.html
Ah, great, looking for the error here would have probably been rather
interesting.
Max
