Alexey Kardashevskiy <a...@au1.ibm.com> writes:
> On 06/27/2014 04:47 PM, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
>> PAPR compliant guest calls this in absence of kdump. This finally
>> reaches the guest and can be handled according to the policies set by
>> higher level tools(like taking dump) for further analysis by tools like
>> crash.
>>
>> Linux kernel calls this only when the extended version of os,term is
>> implemented to make sure that a return to the linux kernel is gauranteed.
>>
>> CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <b...@au1.ibm.com>
>> CC: Anton Blanchard <an...@samba.org>
>> CC: Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Nikunj A Dadhania <nik...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>
>> static struct rtas_call {
>> const char *name;
>> spapr_rtas_fn fn;
>> @@ -404,6 +441,10 @@ static void core_rtas_register_types(void)
>> spapr_rtas_register(RTAS_IBM_SET_SYSTEM_PARAMETER,
>> "ibm,set-system-parameter",
>> rtas_ibm_set_system_parameter);
>> + spapr_rtas_register("ibm,os-term",
>> + rtas_ibm_os_term);
>
>
> This just won't compile, spapr_rtas_register() takes 3 parameters now.
duh, i missed that update :(
Resending
> Tokens for "ibm,os-term" and "ibm,extended-os-term" are already defined,
> just use them.
>
>
>
>> + spapr_rtas_register("ibm,extended-os-term",
>> + rtas_ibm_ext_os_term);
>> }
>>
>> type_init(core_rtas_register_types)
>>
>
>
> ps. please (please) do not use my ibm's email in public :)
Sure.
Regards
Nikunj
