According to the ARM ARM we weren't correctly flushing the TLB entries where bits 63:56 didn't match bit 55 of the virtual address. This exposed a problem when we switched QEMU's internal TARGET_PAGE_BITS to 12 for aarch64.
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> diff --git a/target-arm/helper.c b/target-arm/helper.c index aa5d267..b0d0411 100644 --- a/target-arm/helper.c +++ b/target-arm/helper.c @@ -1766,12 +1766,19 @@ static CPAccessResult aa64_cacheop_access(CPUARMState *env, return CP_ACCESS_OK; } +/* See: D4.7.2 TLB maintenance requirements and the TLB maintenance instructions + * Page D4-1736 (DDI0487A.b) "For TLB maintenance instructions that + * take an address, the maintenance of VA[63:56] is interpreted as + * being the same as the maintenance of VA[55]" + */ + static void tlbi_aa64_va_write(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri, uint64_t value) { /* Invalidate by VA (AArch64 version) */ ARMCPU *cpu = arm_env_get_cpu(env); - uint64_t pageaddr = value << 12; + uint64_t pageaddr = sextract64(value << 12, 0, 56); + tlb_flush_page(CPU(cpu), pageaddr); } @@ -1780,7 +1787,8 @@ static void tlbi_aa64_vaa_write(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri, { /* Invalidate by VA, all ASIDs (AArch64 version) */ ARMCPU *cpu = arm_env_get_cpu(env); - uint64_t pageaddr = value << 12; + uint64_t pageaddr = sextract64(value << 12, 0, 56); + tlb_flush_page(CPU(cpu), pageaddr); } -- 2.0.2