07.07.2014 23:13, Stefan Weil wrote: [] > index 35316c4..ff4f200 100644 > --- a/hw/virtio/vhost-backend.c > +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-backend.c > @@ -14,8 +14,6 @@ > > #include <sys/ioctl.h> > > -extern const VhostOps user_ops; > -
BTW, it looks like we still have just one VhostOps - this user_ops one - despite commit 24d1eb33eb2ccd995a which was aimed to add another ops (kernel) back in May. Maybe we should not add extra indirection without a reason, before it is actually used? Also, "user_ops" is way too generic name. Maybe user_vhost_ops or something. Just.. saying. Thanks, /mjt