zhanghailiang writes: > Reviewed-by: Gonglei <arei.gong...@huawei.com> > Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghaili...@huawei.com> > --- > util/path.c | 9 ++++++--- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/util/path.c b/util/path.c > index 5c59d9f..df1653f 100644 > --- a/util/path.c > +++ b/util/path.c > @@ -46,9 +46,12 @@ static struct pathelem *new_entry(const char *root, > const char *name) > { > struct pathelem *new = malloc(sizeof(*new)); > - new->name = strdup(name); > - new->pathname = g_strdup_printf("%s/%s", root, name); > - new->num_entries = 0;
Erm... isn't that malloc wrong as sizeof(*new) would be the size of a pointer? > + > + if (new) { > + new->name = strdup(name); > + new->pathname = g_strdup_printf("%s/%s", root, name); > + new->num_entries = 0; > + } > return new; > } A better approach may be to just g_malloc which would abort on failure (which would be fine for setup). static struct pathelem *new_entry(const char *root, struct pathelem *parent, const char *name) { struct pathelem *new = g_malloc(sizeof(pathelem)); new->name = g_strdup(name); new->pathname = g_strdup_printf("%s/%s", root, name); new->num_entries = 0; return new; } -- Alex Bennée