On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 12:18:47PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 07/08/2014 04:24, Amos Kong ha scritto:
> > Eduardo, a similar patch had been applied.
> > 
> > commit 5e490b6a504912225dff0e520e1c6af68295d238
> > Author: Amos Kong <ak...@redhat.com>
> > Date:   Thu Nov 21 16:42:50 2013 +0800
> > 
> >     rng-egd: remove redundant free
> >     
> >     We didn't set default chr_name, the free is redundant.
> >     
> >     Signed-off-by: Amos Kong <ak...@redhat.com>
> >     Message-id: 1385023371-8198-2-git-send-email-ak...@redhat.com
> >     Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aligu...@amazon.com>
> > 
> 
> What if you set chr_name twice?
 
In this case, g_free() is necessary.

So I'm fine with Eduardo's patch: [PATCH RESEND 1/2] rng-egd: Free old chr_name 
value

> Paolo

-- 
                        Amos.

Reply via email to