> From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:pbonz...@redhat.com] > Il 27/08/2014 12:15, Pavel Dovgaluk ha scritto: > >> > Again, this is only needed in your record/replay system (and you haven't > >> > yet quite explained why the design has this limitation), so it should > >> > not be a part of this series. > > I see. Updating s->timer and s->TimerExpire in post_load will be enough? > > In theory it should be done already, I guess it's not deterministic > enough though.
I split existing function into the two parts: one sets irq (and calls another). And the second part sets only timer and TimerExpire fields. The second function is also called from post_load. > Have you tried my patch to rewrite the timer stuff? What patch do you mean? Pavel Dovgalyuk
