On 09/15/2014 09:57 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 15/09/2014 16:44, arei.gong...@huawei.com ha scritto: >> From: Gonglei <arei.gong...@huawei.com> >> >> At present, people have no way to know they should >> have a specific format for alias properties. >> >> Example: >> >> before output: >> >> virtio-blk-pci.physical_block_size=uint16 >> virtio-blk-pci.logical_block_size=uint16 >> virtio-blk-pci.drive=str >> >> after output applied this patch series: >> >> virtio-blk-pci.physical_block_size=blocksize >> virtio-blk-pci.logical_block_size=blocksize >> virtio-blk-pci.drive=drive > > Is there actually anyone that is relying on the legacy_names of > properties? I would be inclined to drop them altogether...
Libvirt does not appear to be relying on legacy names, but that's not conclusive evidence in favor of removing... -- Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
