Am 09.10.2014 um 12:09 schrieb Gonglei: > On 2014/10/9 17:47, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > >> On Mi, 2014-10-08 at 19:00 +0800, Gonglei wrote: >>> On 2014/10/7 16:00, Gonglei (Arei) wrote: >>> >>>> From: Gonglei <[email protected]> >>>> >>>> Changes since v10: >>>> 1. add handler for virtio-blk-pci/s390/ccw in PATCH 28. >>>> 2. add especial bootidnex setter/getter functions for usb-storage >>>> device in PATCH 29. >>>> 3. add bootindex qom property for nvma and ne2k_isa devices, >>>> avoid regrassion in PATCH 30. >>>> 4. change fprintf to error_report in bootdevice.c in PATCH 34. >>>> 5. rebase on the latest qemu master tree. >>>> 6. add 'Reviewed-by' in other patches. (Thanks, Gerd) >>>> >>> >>> >>> Hi, Gerd >>> >>> Could you please review the v11 and consider to merge this series in your >>> tree? >>> I have no idea which maintainer can apply this series. It seems that only >>> you >>> and Eduardo interested in and reviewed this patch series at present. :( >> >> Yea, for these cross-tree changes it isn't always clear which way they >> should be merged. qom or pc would make sense I think. >> >> I can prepare a pull request too, but I'd like to have a second opinion >> on the stuff which is outside of my primary focus: >> > > Thanks a lot! > >> * fw_cfg changes (mst? paolo?) >> * qom bits (andreas? paolo?, eduardo?)
I'll try to look at whatever QOM bits, but I don't have the time to take another large series myself right now. Not everything using QOM (as opposed to changing QOM) needs to go through qom-next. :) Thanks, Andreas >> > > I will appreciate for your review, guys :) > > Best regards, > -Gonglei > >> I'll go take "no answer" as "no objections", but I'd prefer to apply one >> or another "reviewed-by" to the series. >> >> thanks, >> Gerd >> >> > > > > -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
