On 2014-10-20 16:23, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > WRT intel_iommu, it does not yet seem to be as fully functional as I > hoped.
What is missing or broken? > People also discussed the best way to handle virtio versus iommu > (it bypasses it ATM). We need to declare in the ACPI tables that the emulated IOMMUs do not cover those "special" virtio devices. > I'd like to suggest we hide the iommu from the command line > help for 2.2, this way people don't activate it mistakenly. > > Let's make it more complete and then enable for 2.3. > > Thoughts? We need the list of issues on the table, then we can decide. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SES-DE Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
