On 20/11/2014 07:55, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > I thought we agreed we'll consider alternate approaches after 2.2? > I would prefer not to have yet another mode to support > if we can help it.
I agree, but: 1) looks like there is stronger opposition to your patch than I thought, so a 2.2 solution as in this patch becomes more palatable 2) reviewing patches is always nice, and helps evaluating the advantages of either approach Paolo
