On 11/20/2014 04:04 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: >> >> We're "only" talking about an optimisation here, even though a very >> useful one, so I wouldn't easily make compromises here. We should >> probably insist on using the node-name. Management tools need new code >> anyway to make use of the new functionality, so they can implement >> node-name support as well while they're at it. > > Using node-name is the best thing to do. > > My concern is just whether libvirt and other management tools are > actually using node-name yet.
Libvirt is not yet using it, but the more compelling we make it, the more libvirt will accelerate the efforts needed to start using node-name. I'm okay with requiring node-name here. -- Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
