Amos Kong <[email protected]> writes: > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 09:06:34AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> Gerd Hoffmann <[email protected]> writes: >> >> > Ongoing discussions on how we are going to specify the console, >> > so tag the command as experiemntal so we can refine things in >> > the 2.3 development cycle. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <[email protected]> >> > --- >> > qmp-commands.hx | 12 ++++++------ >> >> Don't you need to patch qapi-schema.json, too? > > Not necessary in function level.
s/need to/want to/? For consistency, especially because the QAPI schema also serves as QMP command documentation. >> Do we actually explain "x- means experimental" anywhere? > > What's the official way to make command experimental? I think we have an understanding / convention that an "x-" prefix marks names as unstable API. But I can't find it spelled out anywhere. Anyway, separate issue. > Quote from qapi-schema.json: > | # Notes: This command is experimental and may change > | syntax in future releases. Next to the return type ObjectTypeInfo rathe than the command qom-list-types, blech.
