On Wed, 10 Mar 2010, Juan Quintela wrote:

> malc <av1...@comtv.ru> wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Mar 2010, Juan Quintela wrote:
> 
> >> -        for(ioh = first_io_handler; ioh != NULL; ioh = ioh->next) {
> >> +        QTAILQ_FOREACH(ioh, &io_handlers, next) {
> >>              if (ioh->fd == fd)
> >>                  goto found;
> >>          }
> >>          ioh = qemu_mallocz(sizeof(IOHandlerRecord));
> >> -        ioh->next = first_io_handler;
> >> -        first_io_handler = ioh;
> >> +        QTAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&io_handlers, ioh, next);
> >
> > The old code inserted at the head, didn't it?
> 
> Sorry, you are right, it shouldn't matter too much, but it is a change.

If it did, why queue instead of list?

> 
> Later, Juan.
> 

-- 
mailto:av1...@comtv.ru


Reply via email to