07.12.2014 21:20, Antony Pavlov wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Antony Pavlov <antonynpav...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  hw/block/pflash_cfi02.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/block/pflash_cfi02.c b/hw/block/pflash_cfi02.c
> index 8513a17..389b4aa 100644
> --- a/hw/block/pflash_cfi02.c
> +++ b/hw/block/pflash_cfi02.c
> @@ -744,6 +744,7 @@ static void pflash_cfi02_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, 
> void *data)
>  
>      dc->realize = pflash_cfi02_realize;
>      dc->props = pflash_cfi02_properties;
> +    set_bit(DEVICE_CATEGORY_STORAGE, dc->categories);
>  }
>  
>  static const TypeInfo pflash_cfi02_info = {

Hm.  While the patch itself is trivial, and it _seems_ it
fixes a bug, I'm not sure of possible effects of this.

What prob it has now, does this device work?  If yes,
why it needs fixing?  Do we care about compatibility
with previous versions, about migration?

Cc'ing block device people...

Thanks,

/mjt


Reply via email to