On 08/01/2015 14:27, Peter Maydell wrote: > So does this mean that we still have other broken options? Do we > have a timescale for fixing them? I was hoping to be able to commit > a patchset fixing these regressions this week; if we can't do that > then we should probably revert the original changes instead :-(
Based on a grep of machine_opts, the following suboptions are broken: - mem-merge - dump-guest-core - phandle_start - iommu - kernel_irqchip - kvm_shadow_mem None is really as important as -usb, so I would have no problem with unfreezing the tree, but we definitely should have a timeframe for fixing it. Paolo
