Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> writes: > On 15 February 2015 at 03:02, David Gibson <da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au> > wrote: >> Godammit. Have I mentioned lately how much it pisses me off that we >> have various config symbols and it's never clear which ones make it >> into C and which are only in make. > > That does seem confusing. Is there a reason we can't have a > config-devices.h which gets created from config-devices.mak?
Newsflash: homespun configuration system confusing, film at eleven. (Autoconf is also confusing, but at least it's the same confusion everywhere) Back to serious: patching configure to make sure all the CONFIG_ make variables make it into header files sounds good to me. With #ifdef tests, forgetting to include the header switches things off. A single header makes guarding against that mistake easier: every .c needs to include it first, check with grep.
