On 3 March 2015 at 01:18, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote: > Am 02.03.2015 um 16:30 schrieb Peter Maydell: >> Because nobody followed up to this cover letter to say "don't apply this". > > That's pretty much what I replied to 04/11, and I expected you to see > that, in particular since you were on CC and chimed in. :/
I do mean literally "to the cover letter" there, since gmail doesn't thread emails :-( Since I'm just doing this pullreq processing in odd moments of free time at the moment I'm less likely to remember bits of context like that. > I had some of Eduardo's alternative patches queued already and will look > into fixing this mess... I can just revert the whole set if you like, since I haven't applied anything else on top yet. >> I process pullreqs in first-in-first-out order and I rely on >> submitters (or others) letting me know if there's a reason not to >> apply something, and on people not submitting pullreqs including >> patches which have got negative review on list :-( > > In this case it was Eduardo's first pull request, with overlap between > qom-cpu and target-i386 responsibilities and Paolo having given an Rb > for a full APIC movement series rather than the individual patches I > pointed out. That requires a bit more review. Yes, you're right in retrospect. -- PMM
