* Michael Tokarev (m...@tls.msk.ru) wrote:
> 04.03.2015 15:16, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > * Michael Tokarev (m...@tls.msk.ru) wrote:
> >> Do not check for rdma->host being empty twice.  This removes a large
> >> "if" block, so code indentation is changed.  While at it, remove an
> >> ugly goto from the loop, replacing it with a cleaner if logic.  And
> >> finally, there's no need to initialize `ret' variable since is always
> >> has a value.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <m...@tls.msk.ru>
> > 
> > Juan/Amit: There's a space at the end of a line that got in, so
> >            that just needs fixing in the merge;  it's after the 'break;'
> 
> I already fixed it in my tree two days ago.
> 
> > but the patch is a big improvement on what's there:
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilb...@redhat.com>
> > 
> > also tested on an RDMA system.
> 
> Thank you!
> 
> I think it's okay to merge it using the -trivial tree, I'm about to
> send a pull request today.

Yes, OK, although I'd generally prefer the RDMA stuff to go
through migration unless it's really trivial.

Dave

> 
> /mjt
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilb...@redhat.com / Manchester, UK

Reply via email to