On 04/02/2010 10:11 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 04/02/2010 05:08 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Having kvm-all.c compile with and without CONFIG_KVM is pretty ugly
IMHO.
Is compiling vl.c once really that important of a goal?
I didn't do this to compile vl.c once. I don't care about that.
I did this as an initial step towards having kvm functions stubbed out
for !CONFIG_KVM, instead of relying on GCC performing
dead-code-elimination on kvm_enabled().
I'd prefer a kvm-stub.c implementation as opposed to mixing in
CONFIG_KVM in kvm-all.c
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
Paolo
