On 9 April 2015 at 10:59, Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.igles...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 09:09:52PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: >> Make address_space_rw take transaction attributes, rather >> than always using the 'unspecified' attributes. > > Reviewed-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.igles...@xilinx.com> > > I guess that we eventually will need to convert the dma_ > functions?
Probably, though I'm not clear what they bring to the party that the basic address_space_* functions don't (part of why I left them alone). -- PMM
