On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 1:18 AM, Alistair Francis <alistai...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If correctly configured allow the STM32F2xx timer to print
> out the PWM duty cycle information.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alist...@alistair23.me>
> ---
>
> hw/timer/stm32f2xx_timer.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/timer/stm32f2xx_timer.c b/hw/timer/stm32f2xx_timer.c
> index ecadf9d..6f463e8 100644
> --- a/hw/timer/stm32f2xx_timer.c
> +++ b/hw/timer/stm32f2xx_timer.c
> @@ -49,6 +49,16 @@ static void stm32f2xx_timer_interrupt(void *opaque)
> qemu_irq_pulse(s->irq);
> stm32f2xx_timer_set_alarm(s, s->hit_time);
> }
> +
> + if (s->tim_ccmr1 & (TIM_CCMR1_OC2M2 + TIM_CCMR1_OC2M1) &&
> + !(s->tim_ccmr1 & TIM_CCMR1_OC2M0) &&
> + (s->tim_ccmr1 & TIM_CCMR1_OC2PE) &&
Bracing looks inconsistent. Can you drop this set of () to make it
consistent with one below?
> + s->tim_ccer & TIM_CCER_CC2E) {
> + /* PWM 2 - Mode 1 */
> + DB_PRINT("Duty Cycle: %d%%\n",
> + s->tim_ccr2 / (100 * (s->tim_psc + 1)));
> + stm32f2xx_timer_set_alarm(s, s->hit_time);
This looks like a functional change - why do you need to set the alarm
for PWM? Commit messages suggests this is supposed to just add debug
printfs.
Regards,
Peter
> + }
> }
>
> static inline int64_t stm32f2xx_ns_to_ticks(STM32F2XXTimerState *s, int64_t
> t)
> --
> 2.1.4
>
>
