Hi Paolo, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> writes: > On 29/04/2015 10:14, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote: >> >> Hi Paolo, >> >> David Gibson <da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au> writes: >>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 01:30:29PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote: >>>> On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 12:23:25 +0530 >>>> Nikunj A Dadhania <nik...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: >>> [snip] >>>> Looks good to me. >>>> >>>> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> >>> >>> Same here, >>> >>> Reviewed-by: David Gibson <da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au> >> >> Can you push this patch via you tree? >> >> David will push the spapr changes dependent on this patch through his >> tree. >> >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2015-04/msg04006.html >> >> Regards, >> Nikunj >> > > Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> > > so David can push both patches. > > But isn't 1G a bit too much? At least on x86 you can easily boot with 512M.
I understood this number as not the _minimum memory_ to boot the VM. And this will only come in picture when the user has not specified any memory. I have seen the PPC64 VM booting with 256M. Regards, Nikunj
