On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 14:23:20 -0300
Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 07:05:55PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> > Am 25.04.2015 um 17:28 schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
> > > The QJSON code used casts to (QJSON*) directly, instead of OBJECT_CHECK.
> > > There were even some functions using object_dynamic_cast() calls
> > > followed by assert(), which is exactly what OBJECT_CHECK does (by
> > > calling object_dynamic_cast_assert()).
> > 
> > Suggest s/OBJECT_CHECK/OBJECT_CHECK()/g everywhere for clarity.

Everywhere? You mean, in other places? In this case someone has to
post a different patch.

> I assume it can be fixed during commit by whoever is going to queue it.
> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > >  qjson.c | 10 +++++-----
> > >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de>
> > 
> > Wasn't aware QJSON is using QOM - assuming this will go through some
> > QAPI/QMP tree.
> 
> The only user of qjson.c right now is migration code. Should it go through
> the migration tree?

It could be, but I can take it if nobody does.

> Also, why do we have two JSON writers in QEMU? And why do they have
> exactly the same name?

Not sure I got it, which writers?

Reply via email to