On Mon, June 22, 2015 10:07 am, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 03:04:13PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> >> >> On 22/06/2015 14:47, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> > Because it's a pain if I need to move code between files with >> different >> > licenses. MIT is GPL compatible but mixing licenses at random is >> still >> > not a good idea. >> >> This is a non-problem. How often does it happen that code is moved >> between files (as opposed to extracted to a new file)? >> >> Besides, the rule you want is not enforceable because Fabrice Bellard >> explicitly wanted TCG-related files to be BSD. >> >> Paolo > > It's not a big deal, but it's preferable if possible. > Paulo do you have a problem switching to GPLv2+?
Hi Michael, No, I really don't. If it's really preferable and brings advantage to the project, then I see no problem at all. Thanks, Paulo -- Paulo Alcantara, C.E.S.A.R Speaking for myself only.