Am 10.05.2010 22:20, schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 12:07:40PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>> + if (type == 0x6d697368 && count >= 244) {
>>> int new_size, chunk_count;
>>> - if(lseek(s->fd,200,SEEK_CUR)<0)
>>> - goto fail;
>>> +
>>> + offset += 4;
>>
>> Isn't this needed in the else case, too?
>
> I don't think so. For that case we previously did a
>
> lseek(s->fd,count-4,SEEK_CUR)
>
> to undo the 4 byte advance done by the read.
You're right. Somehow I completely missed the original then branch and
that you changed the condition.
Kevin
