On 28.04.2010 12:45, Gleb Natapov wrote: > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 12:41:51PM +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote: > >> The CPU declarations are particularly tricky as they get pretty big and >> complex and need to live in the DSDT, whereas a lot of other things we >> can shift off to separate SSDT tables and only put the minimum that >> needs to be generated dynamically in it's own table. >> >> > We can generate complex code statically and call it from dynamically > generated CPU declarations. >
There is some ACPI code generator in coreboot. Not sure if it is usable for those purposes. coreboot uses it to generate AMD CPU frequency tables. Regards, Carl-Daniel -- http://www.hailfinger.org/
