Am 28.08.2015 um 13:56 schrieb Gerd Hoffmann: > On Do, 2015-08-27 at 14:46 +0200, Peter Lieven wrote: >> I have observed that depending on the contents and the encoding it happens >> that sending data as RAW sometimes would take less space than the encoded >> data. >> This is especially the case for small updates or areas with high color >> images. >> If sending RAW encoded data is beneficial allow a fall back to RAW encoding >> for the framebuffer update. > Do you happen to have some stats for this, especially the "small update" > case? We might want to go straight to raw (without trying other > encodings) for small updates, to avoid encoding things twice.
Interesting idea. I think this magic number is different for each encoding though. I think its possible to calculate it and then know that a update ip to a given size cannot be smaller than encoded in raw - no matter what contents are in that update. Peter
