Alexander Graf wrote: > On 15.05.2010, at 10:36, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >> Alexander Graf wrote: >>> On 14.05.2010, at 18:17, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>>> Alexander Graf wrote: >>>>> Now that I can finally reproduce the bug with --enable-io-thread, I can >>>>> verify that it does *not* fix the issue. >>>> I do not trust your tests. :p >>>> >>>> I just tried to reproduce with --enable-io-thread and the setup I >>>> described above - all still fine here. Can you reproduce with an x86 guest? >>> Nope, it works fine with an x86 guest. I put the following in /etc/inittab >>> of my guest: >>> >>> 11:2345:respawn:/sbin/mingetty --noclear /dev/hvc0 linux >>> >>> One major thing to keep in mind when talking about s390 guests is that we >>> almost never trap into userspace. >> Do you have the same problem when using an unbuffered backend, e.g. pty? >> Maybe that single-byte "fifo" of stdio makes the difference, though I >> wonder why only on s390 (guest exists should not block the polling done >> by the io-thread, just accelerate it). > > Mind to give me a small example on how to use that? :)
-chardev pty,... echo whatever > /dev/pts/<n> Or you set up a telnet server. Jan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
