On 11 September 2015 at 15:40, Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.igles...@xilinx.com> wrote: > In the interest avoiding duplication, do you think the following makes > sense for regs with the el3_aa32ns_aa64any access checks? > > 1. Use STATE_BOTH for "low-activity" registers (e.g the EL3 view when EL2 > does not exist). > 2. Use STATE_BOTH for regs that anyway have a read/write function > 3. Split AA64 and AA32 reg entries for regs without read/write helper call > for spead (e.g VTCR_EL2).
Sounds plausible. -- PMM
