On Thu, 20 May 2010 17:16:01 +0200
Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 05/20/2010 03:44 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > I think there's another issue in the handling of strings.
> >
> > The spec says that valid unescaped chars are in the following range:
> >
> > unescaped = %x20-21 / %x23-5B / %x5D-10FFFF
> >
> > But we do:
> >
> > [IN_DQ_STRING] = {
> > [1 ... 0xFF] = IN_DQ_STRING,
> > ['\\'] = IN_DQ_STRING_ESCAPE,
> > ['"'] = IN_DONE_STRING,
> > },
> >
> > Shouldn't we cover 0x20 .. 0xFF instead?
>
> If it's the lexer, isn't just it being liberal in what it accepts?
Yes, it's the lexer, but you meant that the fix should be in
somewhere else?
