Hi On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Daniel P. Berrange <berra...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 12:54:56PM +0200, marcandre.lur...@redhat.com wrote: >> From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com> >> >> Bump glib requirement to be able to use the GLIB_VERSION macros. > > We had a discussion about glib min version a few months back where it > was decided 2.22 was the maximum we could use at the current time > without us loosing support for certain platforms we care about. > > Simply being able to use the GLIB_VERSION macro does not seem like a > compelling enough reason to re-vist this min version again right now, > as I doubt we've changed our mind on what platforms we wish to target > in the last couple of months.
Fair enough, I couldn't find the discussion where 2.22 was decided to be the maximum requirement, but SLES11 seems to be the reason then. What about just using the macro, but not bumping glib requirement? > > Regards, > Daniel > -- > |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| > |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| > |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| > |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| > -- Marc-André Lureau
