On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 09:42:50PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 13/10/2015 21:30, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > > Yeah, the shutdown behavior was never implemented before, so now we are > > just deviating from the documented Pentium & 486 behavior in a different > > (and less surprising?) way. > > > >> > > >> > With the typo fix in the Cc tag: > >> > > >> > Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com> > > Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> > > Eduardo, it's okay if you take it through your x86 branch; it's not > super urgent.
Applied. Thanks! -- Eduardo
