On 14/10/2015 17:46, Sergey Fedorov wrote: > The first argument of g_free_rcu() is a pointer to a structure. But > foo_reclaim is used as a function name in the previous example along > with &foo as a pointer to the structure being reclaimed. Make the > example consistent with the previous one. > > Signed-off-by: Sergey Fedorov <serge.f...@gmail.com> > --- > docs/rcu.txt | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/docs/rcu.txt b/docs/rcu.txt > index 21ecb81..2f70954 100644 > --- a/docs/rcu.txt > +++ b/docs/rcu.txt > @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ The core RCU API is small: > the callback function is g_free, in particular, g_free_rcu can be > used. In the above case, one could have written simply: > > - g_free_rcu(foo_reclaim, rcu); > + g_free_rcu(&foo, rcu); > > typeof(*p) atomic_rcu_read(p); > >
Thanks, I've queued this patch, and I hope to send it out on Friday. Paolo
