Paolo Bonzini, le Wed 14 Oct 2015 17:51:51 +0200, a écrit : > > > On 12/10/2015 17:41, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Eric Blake, le Mon 12 Oct 2015 09:30:12 -0600, a écrit : > >> Also, I assume that brlapi_perror() adds additional information to > >> the error message it prints, such as conversion of a brlapi-specific > >> error message in the same manner in which perror() converts errno and in > >> which error_setg_errno() would be used. > > > > Yes. Such additional information is really useful to debug brlapi > > issues. > > > >> So I don't know if this > >> conversion is the best. But I'm unfamiliar with brlapi_* in general, to > >> know if there is anything better to use, > > > > brlapi_error_t * brlapi_error_location(void); > > const char * brlapi_strerror(const brlapi_error_t *error); > > > > So brlapi_strerror(brlapi_error_location()) will return what you want, > > i.e. the string that brlapi_error() would have printed. > > Is it okay to squash this?
Yes, this looks right. Building with brlapi-dev installed would confirm for sure that it builds, of course :) Samuel
