Oops my email client dropped Aurelien's email from CC for some reason...
(adding back)
On 19/10/15 17:40, Leon Alrae wrote:
> On 11/10/15 21:30, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> (sorry for the late answer)
>>
>> On 2015-08-26 14:12, Petar Jovanovic wrote:
>>> From: Petar Jovanovic <petar.jovano...@imgtec.com>
>>>
>>> Instructions recip.{s|d} and rsqrt.{s|d} do not require 64-bit FPU neither
>>> they require any particular mode for its FPU. This patch removes the checks
>>> that may break a program that uses these instructions.
>>
>> That is correct. That said these instructions do require at least a
>> MIPS32R2 or a MIPS64R1 CPU. I guess we should add these checks now that
>> check_cop1x do not guard them anymore.
>
> I suspect that this might too restrictive if we take into account also
> legacy processors. As far as I know these instructions were already
> present in MIPS IV implementations. I think it'll be safer if for the
> pre-MIPS32R2 and pre-MIPS64R1 CPUs we keep the check_cop1x. (actually
> I'm not certain if check_cop1x is correct, but at least we aren't
> relaxing the previous restrictions too much).
>
> Regards,
> Leon
>
