On 28 October 2015 at 19:25, Laurent Vivier <laur...@vivier.eu> wrote: > > > Le 28/10/2015 20:20, Peter Maydell a écrit : >> On 28 October 2015 at 19:13, Laurent Vivier <laur...@vivier.eu> wrote: >>> +static abi_long packet_target_to_host_addr(void *host_addr, >>> + abi_ulong target_addr, >>> + socklen_t len) >> >> Should the function name be ..._to_host_sockaddr ? > > It was what I did in my first draft, but as I have called the type > TargetFdDataFunc and TargetFdAddrFunc, I have chosen to call the > function _addr. > > If you think it is better, I can change that.
Well, it is sockaddr types we're handling, so it seems a bit clearer to use that in the name. thanks -- PMM
