On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:04:43 +0200
Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12/10/2015 01:41 AM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > it will help to call a method with 0 arguments
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imamm...@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > hw/acpi/aml-build.c | 8 ++++++++
> > include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/acpi/aml-build.c b/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
> > index ee34771..50587de 100644
> > --- a/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
> > +++ b/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
> > @@ -540,6 +540,14 @@ Aml *aml_notify(Aml *arg1, Aml *arg2)
> > }
> >
> > /* helper to call method with 1 argument */
> > +Aml *aml_call0(const char *method)
> > +{
> > + Aml *var = aml_alloc();
> > + build_append_namestring(var->buf, "%s", method);
> > + return var;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* helper to call method with 1 argument */
> > Aml *aml_call1(const char *method, Aml *arg1)
> > {
> > Aml *var = aml_alloc();
> > diff --git a/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h
> > b/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h index 9761438..117ef46 100644
> > --- a/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h
> > +++ b/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h
> > @@ -210,6 +210,7 @@ Aml *aml_increment(Aml *arg);
> > Aml *aml_decrement(Aml *arg);
> > Aml *aml_index(Aml *arg1, Aml *idx);
> > Aml *aml_notify(Aml *arg1, Aml *arg2);
> > +Aml *aml_call0(const char *method);
> > Aml *aml_call1(const char *method, Aml *arg1);
> > Aml *aml_call2(const char *method, Aml *arg1, Aml *arg2);
> > Aml *aml_call3(const char *method, Aml *arg1, Aml *arg2, Aml
> > *arg3);
> >
>
> Maybe aml_call instead of aml_call0 that implies some 'zero'
> initialization? It doesn't really matter.
it's named so for consistency with other aml_callX() helpers.
>
> Reviewed-by: Marcel Apfelbaum <mar...@redhat.com>
>
