Hi,
On 12/20/2015 06:22 PM, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
Hi,
On 12/18/2015 01:03 PM, Cao jin wrote:
Signed-off-by: Cao jin <caoj.f...@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c | 24 ++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c
b/hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c
index 57f8a37..cc975f6 100644
--- a/hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c
+++ b/hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c
@@ -145,19 +145,19 @@ static const TypeInfo pxb_host_info = {
* Returns 0 on successs, -1 if i440fx host was not
* found or the bus number is already in use.
*/
-static int pxb_register_bus(PCIDevice *dev, PCIBus *pxb_bus)
+static int pxb_register_bus(PCIDevice *dev, PCIBus *pxb_bus, Error
**errp)
If you add an err parameter, maybe the function should return void.
Ok, will modify it in V2. Actually, both style are fine with me:)
{
PCIBus *bus = dev->bus;
int pxb_bus_num = pci_bus_num(pxb_bus);
if (bus->parent_dev) {
- error_report("PXB devices can be attached only to root bus.");
+ error_setg(errp, "PXB devices can be attached only to root
bus.");
return -1;
}
QLIST_FOREACH(bus, &bus->child, sibling) {
if (pci_bus_num(bus) == pxb_bus_num) {
- error_report("Bus %d is already in use.", pxb_bus_num);
+ error_setg(errp, "Bus %d is already in use.", pxb_bus_num);
return -1;
}
}
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ static gint pxb_compare(gconstpointer a,
gconstpointer b)
0;
}
-static int pxb_dev_initfn(PCIDevice *dev)
+static void pxb_dev_realize(PCIDevice *dev, Error **errp)
{
PXBDev *pxb = PXB_DEV(dev);
DeviceState *ds, *bds;
@@ -202,8 +202,8 @@ static int pxb_dev_initfn(PCIDevice *dev)
if (pxb->numa_node != NUMA_NODE_UNASSIGNED &&
pxb->numa_node >= nb_numa_nodes) {
- error_report("Illegal numa node %d.", pxb->numa_node);
- return -EINVAL;
+ error_setg(errp, "Illegal numa node %d.", pxb->numa_node);
+ return;
}
if (dev->qdev.id && *dev->qdev.id) {
@@ -225,8 +225,8 @@ static int pxb_dev_initfn(PCIDevice *dev)
PCI_HOST_BRIDGE(ds)->bus = bus;
- if (pxb_register_bus(dev, bus)) {
- return -EINVAL;
+ if (pxb_register_bus(dev, bus, errp)) {
+ goto err_register_bus;
}
qdev_init_nofail(ds);
@@ -237,7 +237,11 @@ static int pxb_dev_initfn(PCIDevice *dev)
pci_config_set_class(dev->config, PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_HOST);
pxb_dev_list = g_list_insert_sorted(pxb_dev_list, pxb,
pxb_compare);
- return 0;
+
+err_register_bus:
+ object_unref(OBJECT(ds));
+ object_unref(OBJECT(bds));
+ object_unref(OBJECT(bus));
The order should be in the reverse order of creation:
bds, bus, ds
Ok, I can do that. But it seems the order here doesn`t matter? Is there
dependency among these three?
}
static void pxb_dev_exitfn(PCIDevice *pci_dev)
@@ -259,7 +263,7 @@ static void pxb_dev_class_init(ObjectClass *klass,
void *data)
DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
PCIDeviceClass *k = PCI_DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
- k->init = pxb_dev_initfn;
+ k->realize = pxb_dev_realize;
k->exit = pxb_dev_exitfn;
If init is converted to realize, maybe the exit should be converted to
unrealize?
Yup, I agree with you from the point that the names should be antonym.
But it seems there is no PCIDeviceClass.unrealize:(
And I am also not aware why there is no comment for .exit while there is
for .init. It is appreciated if somebody could tell me the history O:-)
Thanks,
Marcel
k->vendor_id = PCI_VENDOR_ID_REDHAT;
k->device_id = PCI_DEVICE_ID_REDHAT_PXB;
.
--
Yours Sincerely,
Cao Jin