On 8 January 2016 at 00:39, Alistair Francis <alistair.fran...@xilinx.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 8:33 AM, Alistair Francis > <alistair.fran...@xilinx.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> >> wrote: >>> On 15 December 2015 at 20:52, Peter Crosthwaite >>> <crosthwaitepe...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> It needs to exist before it can be used so there is a bit of a chicken >>>> and egg problem there. > > No one seems to be jumping at reviewing this. Can we just send a pull request?
I don't necessarily require review [*]. I would like *somebody* other than you Xilinx folk to say "yes, I think I would use this for modelling devices". Otherwise all we have is "weird thing used only in two or three Xilinx devices and nowhere else", which I'm a bit reluctant to let into the tree. We already have a pretty wide divergence in how devices look just based on the various transitions from older to newer qdev/QOM/etc that are not complete. [*] by which I mean, I will review this series if you can find somebody else who's going to say they'd use it. thanks -- PMM
