On 2016年01月14日 17:41, Laurent Vivier wrote: > > Le 14/01/2016 10:37, Chen Gang a écrit : >> >> On 2016年01月14日 17:10, Laurent Vivier wrote: >>> >>> Le 14/01/2016 10:01, Chen Gang a écrit : >>>> >>>> I am not quite sure whether kernel always returns sizeof(int) (I guess, >>>> it should be). >>> >>> it can be 1 only if len is 1, but this is managed below. >>> >> >> Excuse me, I do not quite understand your meaning. >> >> For me, if we are sure lv is always 4 for SO_TYPE, we don't need this >> patch. >> >> If lv may be 1 for SO_TYPE (it means val >> 8 may be zero), after call >> host_to_target_sock_type, val >> 8 may be non-zero, theoretically. In >> this case, we need modify lv to 4. >> >>>> For me, if you are sure, we can skip this patch. >>> >>> Does it fix something ? >>> >> >> It is only theoretical, not real world, at present. > > So I think we can skip it. >
It is OK to me. Thanks. -- Chen Gang (陈刚) Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed
