> > Once you eliminate machine_register_core that knowledge has > > > > somehow got to come from your device tree description file. Having a > > single device tree that can morph into significantly different machines > > seems like unnecessary complexity given this is a user-specified file. > > 99% of qemu users will never touch a device tree. The practical matter > is, we're going to have to provide higher level interfaces that allow a > user to significantly morph a base device tree into something different.
That's the bit I don't get. Why are we significantly morphing a base device tree? Surely it's easier to just use a different base tree. Paul
