On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 08:18:12AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote: > KVM/qemu patches > - patch rate is high, documentation is low, review is low > - patches need to include better descriptions and documentation > - will slow down patch writers > - will make it easier for patch reviewers
What is the qemu patch review policy anyway? There are no "Reviewed-by:" included in the actual commits, and the requirement for a positive review also seem to vary a lot, up to the point that some commiters commit code that has never hit a public mailing list before.
