Michael Fritscher <michael.fritsc...@telematik-zentrum.de> writes: > Hello Greg, > > thanks for your answer! Yes, I already jumped in - I was surprised how > fast it went. I was afraid of much bigger problems ;-) I've a already > a V2 nearly ready :-) As a teaser: Fixed read/write support and the > possibility to execute binaries from the mountpoint. > > Yes, I decided not to copy the 9p-local.c, because I had to change not > as many places I thought in the first place. > > I'm wondering about the xattr stuff... Perhaps I try to remove the > <sys/xattr.h> from hw/9pfs/9p-xattr.h and #ifdef the things which are > broken afterwards. That would have the advantage that I don't have to > have local function stubs in the 9p-local.c anymore. > > To the licence: I asked because I know that other projects have a > formal process to cope with this - like a written agreement to be > bound to the license.
We don't do formal CLAs. Instead, we follow the kernel's lead and require Signed-off-by. http://wiki.qemu-project.org/Contribute/SubmitAPatch#Patch_emails_must_include_a_Signed-off-by:_line Please stick to GPLv2+ for new work, unless you have a really good reason not to. http://wiki.qemu-project.org/License
