Oops, just noticed the SPARC maintainers weren't cc'd on this. -- PMM
On 4 May 2016 at 15:56, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 30 March 2016 at 11:09, xiaoqiang zhao <zxq_yx_...@163.com> wrote: >> This patch set QOM'ify files under hw/intc directory. See each commit >> message for details. >> >> xiaoqiang zhao (9): >> hw/intc: QOM'ify etraxfs_pic.c >> hw/intc: QOM'ify exynos4210_combiner.c >> hw/intc: QOM'ify exynos4210_gic.c >> hw/intc: QOM'ify imx_avic.c >> hw/intc: QOM'ify lm32_pic.c >> hw/intc: QOM'ify pl190.c >> hw/intc: QOM'ify slavio_intctl.c >> hw/intc: QOM'ify grlib_irqmp.c >> hw/intc: QOM'ify omap_intc.c >> >> hw/intc/etraxfs_pic.c | 13 +++++---- >> hw/intc/exynos4210_combiner.c | 14 +++++----- >> hw/intc/exynos4210_gic.c | 39 ++++++++++++++------------- >> hw/intc/grlib_irqmp.c | 27 +++++++++++-------- >> hw/intc/imx_avic.c | 15 +++++------ >> hw/intc/lm32_pic.c | 12 ++++----- >> hw/intc/omap_intc.c | 63 >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ >> hw/intc/pl190.c | 13 +++++---- >> hw/intc/slavio_intctl.c | 14 +++++----- >> 9 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 101 deletions(-) > > Hi. I had a comment on patch 9 (omap_intc), but 1-8 look good. > Only patches 2, 3, 4 and 6 are ARM-related. > > SPARC, lm32, CRIS maintainers: do you want to take your patches > or shall I just take 1-8 through the target-arm.next tree? > > Xaioqiang: if you're planning to do more of these QOMify > series in future it might be easier on maintainers if you > split them up by target architecture rather than by > type-of-device. Otherwise we have lots of these series which > touch devices for four different architectures and should > really go through four different maintainers. > > I forget if I've said this before, but I do really appreciate > these patches -- cleanup of older devices to bring them up > to modern QEMU standards is a thankless task but it's an > important one. > > thanks > -- PMM
