On 09/05/2016 23:37, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > FWIW the response from the LLVM developers: > > https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27688
Why the heck are they saying that -fno-toplevel-reorder is "gone" (or deprecated in the duplicate PR)? Paolo
On 09/05/2016 23:37, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > FWIW the response from the LLVM developers: > > https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27688
Why the heck are they saying that -fno-toplevel-reorder is "gone" (or deprecated in the duplicate PR)? Paolo