On 17/05/2016 13:14, Max Reitz wrote:
>> That could be another BdrvChild member, couldn't it?
>
> I think it would rather require a new function pointer in
> BdrvChildRole (after Kevin's series, that is).

Yes, that's what I meant. :)

Paolo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to