Hi On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Victor Kaplansky <vict...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 06:45:00PM +0200, marcandre.lur...@redhat.com wrote: >> From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com> >> >> If -c is specified, vubr will try to connect to the socket instead of >> listening for connections. >> >> Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com> >> Tested-by: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan....@linux.intel.com> >> Reviewed-by: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan....@linux.intel.com> >> --- >> tests/vhost-user-bridge.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ >> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/tests/vhost-user-bridge.c b/tests/vhost-user-bridge.c >> index 0779ba2..f907ce7 100644 >> --- a/tests/vhost-user-bridge.c >> +++ b/tests/vhost-user-bridge.c >> @@ -1204,12 +1204,13 @@ vubr_accept_cb(int sock, void *ctx) >> } >> >> static VubrDev * >> -vubr_new(const char *path) >> +vubr_new(const char *path, bool client) >> { >> VubrDev *dev = (VubrDev *) calloc(1, sizeof(VubrDev)); >> dev->nregions = 0; >> int i; >> struct sockaddr_un un; >> + CallbackFunc cb; >> size_t len; >> >> for (i = 0; i < MAX_NR_VIRTQUEUE; i++) { >> @@ -1238,19 +1239,27 @@ vubr_new(const char *path) >> un.sun_family = AF_UNIX; >> strcpy(un.sun_path, path); >> len = sizeof(un.sun_family) + strlen(path); >> - unlink(path); >> >> - if (bind(dev->sock, (struct sockaddr *) &un, len) == -1) { >> - vubr_die("bind"); >> - } >> + if (!client) { >> + unlink(path); >> + >> + if (bind(dev->sock, (struct sockaddr *) &un, len) == -1) { >> + vubr_die("bind"); >> + } >> >> - if (listen(dev->sock, 1) == -1) { >> - vubr_die("listen"); >> + if (listen(dev->sock, 1) == -1) { >> + vubr_die("listen"); >> + } >> + cb = vubr_accept_cb; >> + } else { >> + if (connect(dev->sock, (struct sockaddr *)&un, len) == -1) { >> + vubr_die("connect"); >> + } >> + cb = vubr_receive_cb; >> } >> >> dispatcher_init(&dev->dispatcher); >> - dispatcher_add(&dev->dispatcher, dev->sock, (void *)dev, >> - vubr_accept_cb); >> + dispatcher_add(&dev->dispatcher, dev->sock, (void *)dev, cb); >> >> DPRINT("Waiting for connections on UNIX socket %s ...\n", path); > > I think this message should be issued only for server mode.
That should improve this patch: diff --git a/tests/vhost-user-bridge.c b/tests/vhost-user-bridge.c index 38963e4..36b3cd8 100644 --- a/tests/vhost-user-bridge.c +++ b/tests/vhost-user-bridge.c @@ -1258,6 +1258,8 @@ vubr_new(const char *path, bool client) vubr_die("listen"); } cb = vubr_accept_cb; + + DPRINT("Waiting for connections on UNIX socket %s ...\n", path); } else { if (connect(dev->sock, (struct sockaddr *)&un, len) == -1) { vubr_die("connect"); @@ -1268,7 +1270,6 @@ vubr_new(const char *path, bool client) dispatcher_init(&dev->dispatcher); dispatcher_add(&dev->dispatcher, dev->sock, (void *)dev, cb); - DPRINT("Waiting for connections on UNIX socket %s ...\n", path); return dev; } @@ -1427,13 +1428,14 @@ main(int argc, char *argv[]) out: fprintf(stderr, "Usage: %s ", argv[0]); - fprintf(stderr, "[-u ud_socket_path] [-l lhost:lport] [-r rhost:rport]\n"); + fprintf(stderr, "[-c] [-u ud_socket_path] [-l lhost:lport] [-r rhost:rport]\n"); fprintf(stderr, "\t-u path to unix doman socket. default: %s\n", DEFAULT_UD_SOCKET); fprintf(stderr, "\t-l local host and port. default: %s:%s\n", DEFAULT_LHOST, DEFAULT_LPORT); fprintf(stderr, "\t-r remote host and port. default: %s:%s\n", DEFAULT_RHOST, DEFAULT_RPORT); + fprintf(stderr, "\t-c client mode\n"); return 1; } -- Marc-André Lureau